William Engdahl ( https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-own-color-revolution/5716153 ) explains where the money for Black lives Matter, Antifa, Act Blue, and associated socialist organization partners in overthrowing “whiteness” comes from—the Ford Foundation, Soros’ foundations, Kellogg Foundation, Ben & Jerry’s, Hewlett Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Heinz Foundation, Apple, Disney, Nike.
With George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, and Teddy Roosevelt disposed of, Jesus and Christianity are next in line to be finished off. Jesus’ images in statues, paintings, and stained glass windows are a “gross form of White Supremacy” — https://www.rt.com/op-ed/492738-white-jesus-shaun-king-statues-blm/
See also: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/tear-race-activist-shaun-king-calls-removal-statues-white-jesus-european-mother/
It is a mistake to laugh. The intent to obliterate racist white civilization is serious. It is the main goal of American education, the media, and the New York Times’ 1619 Project.
Nothing happens to the thugs who destroy public property. The white establishment has ceded them the right to destroy whatever they say offends them, including businesses.
The white establishment acts as agent for Black Lives Matter. In New York City the American Museum of Natural History has requested the Democrat mayor to remove the statue of President Theodore Roosevelt that adorns the museum’s front steps ( https://www.zerohedge.com/political/roosevelt-statue-be-removed-nycs-museum-natural-history?utm_campaign=&utm_content=ZeroHedge%3A+The+Durden+Dispatch&utm_medium=email&utm_source=zh_newsletter ) .
The statue depicts Roosevelt astride a horse flanked by a muscular and determined-looking black and native American. The statue is said to be an expression of white supremacy, a charge that makes no sense. Why would a white supremacist want his monument fouled by the presence of inferior beings to whom he or the sculptor feels superior? Removing the statue is justified as an inclusive step. But the statue is inclusive—the three races of that time are included. Removing the statue is an act of racism against white people.
And that is the purpose. White people are being humiliated by being made invisible. No statues of them allowed.
Everywhere we see banners proclaiming that Black Lives Matter. The banner’s exclusion of other lives doesn’t damn the banner as racist. But when a banner proclaiming that White Lives Matter was flown over a British soccer stadium, it came under police investigation as a possible racially-aggravated public order offense. The “racist” banner was a response to the murder the previous day of three white people by a Libyan immigrant-invader in a public park in Reading, England.
The largely white Burnley soccer team and the team’s white CEO were “ashamed and embarrassed” by the racist statement that White Lives Matter—https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/53145201 . The team’s white CEO said the banner incited racial hatred—https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/24/football/burnley-white-lives-matter-banner-wajid-khan-neil-hart-emile-heskey-spt-intl/index.html . The football team apologized for something it did not do, denounced the “offensive banner” and declared that the team will “work fully with the authorities to identify those responsible and take appropriate action.”
You dumbshit white person, how dare you think your life matters. Appropriate action will be taken against you.
CNN said that the White Lives Matter banner struck a “discordant note” on a team that took a knee in homage to black power and in place of their names on their jerseys had “Black Lives Matter” in memory of George Floyd who killed himself by overdosing on a dangerous drug.
What is going on here? The inclusion of blacks or the exclusion of whites?
Isn’t the message that only black lives matter?
Does a race have a future when it is incapable of recognizing that it is under attack and in place of self-defense instead grovels?